Myths Regarding LASIK and ASA (PRK, LASEK, epi LASIK, Supra LASIK) Comparison in Thin Corneas
In fact, in a head to head trail to dispel this myth, Daniel Durrie MD and Stephen Slade MD, compared wavefront-guided thin-flap LASIK (SBK with a femtosecond laser-created 100 micron, 8.5mm flap) and advanced surface ablation in fellow eyes of 50 bilaterally operated patients.
They showed that during follow-up visits through the first month after surgery, the advanced surface ablation procedure was associated with more pain and lower patient satisfaction. Also, the visual outcomes were significantly better in the LASIK eyes on the first day after surgery and remained so for at least three months
The newer LASIK machines like the wavefront-guided LASIK and Contoura Vision Topography Guided LASIK correct the vision based on the eye’s unique attributes and enable the creation of thinner, narrower, and planar flaps, just like femtosecond laser LASIK. These thin flaps allow stromal ablation in even patients with thin corneas with great efficacy and safety. Most doctors agree that thinner flaps (100 µm) have a better postop visual acuity compared with thicker flaps as well. The Contoura Vision Topography Guided LASIK, in fact, provides a better quality of vision than any other laser refractive procedure, in patients with thin corneas also.
Also, most doctors are also now aware of the fact that patients with thinner corneas are NOT more susceptible to ectasia or protrusion of the cornea, since the thinner corneas have altered biomechanics, making them stronger. In fact, the most important risk factor for ectasia is keratoconus (disease and forme fruste) which must be ruled out before any laser refractive procedure. Both LASIK and ASA are contraindicated in patients with keratoconus.